This rumour has been going round and round for a long time and we believe this is just the celebrity press looking for a story.
---------------------
Reported earlier today by Star Magazine, Jennifer Aniston has begun paperwork with a California adoption agency to get herself a baby boy. According to a "friend" of the "Friends" star, Aniston has already dropped $250,000 on a nursery and is being guiding through the process by her friend, singer Sheryl Crow.
"[Jennifer] doesn't want to wait,†the source tells Star. "Her best friends all have kids, and Jen sees how much motherhood changed their lives for the best. She's dying to have that!" The source adds that Crow, who adopted a baby boy two years ago, has been "walking [Jennifer] through the process step by step."
--------
We are not sure how the Star Magazine can get away with printing rubbish like this!
You never know what to believe when it comes to stuff like this. Bradd was supposed to have split partialy due to the fact that Jen didn't want kids, Jen has supposedly hit back saying the stories are untrue.
When you think about it, Brad is now a father to both biological & adopted kids with Angelina, yet no where do we see jen with a kid in any sense of the word.
Jen is far from poor, and even though her luck, or should I say lack of luck with men may play a part in her not having a wee one, why with all her wealth and pulling power does she not have a baby by now? I'm not critising, just asking a very intruiging question. For someone so desparate to have kids, she is now 40 years old , and I'm sorry to say this but who in their right minds wants to be a mother at that age? Money or no, fertile or not, no child wants a granny for a Mum, and no amount of face lifts or botox is going to change that!
Posted by: Celticfairy40 | May 12, 2009 at 11:57 PM